SAIM BAKAR VS BIBLICAL 'ISLAM'

IKHWAN SERIES 4 : SOME RIDICULOUS BUKHARI HADITH.

2010-11-28T19:45:00.000-08:00

IKHWAN SERIES 4 : SOME RIDICULOUS BUKHARI HADITH.

Here are some really ridiculous Bukhari hadith. The reader must bear in mind that this is despite the ulema’s claim that the “Al-Jami'us Sahih of Imam al-Bukhari is rightfully privileged tobe called a gigantic ocean serenely flowing for the providence and safeguard of those precious pieces of magnificence”.

Here are some of those precious pieces of magnificence:

Bukhari Volume 1, Book 9, Number 490: Narrated 'Aisha: The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, "Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman." I said, "You have made us (i.e. women) dogs. I saw the Prophet praying while I used to lie in my bed between him and the Qibla. Whenever I was in need of something, I would slip away. for I disliked to face him."

So women are akin to dogs and donkeys.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 537: Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said "If a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease."

Dunking flies in your tea will spread disease. Here is an adjunct to this strange cure :

(Bukhari Kitabul Ilm vol.2, hadith 77). Mahmood bin Rabe narrates, “I still remember when I was five years old, the Holy Prophet rinsed his mouth and then spat the water into mine”

This is a nonsensical and most unhygienic practice. It will spread even more disease.

Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 5: Narrated 'Ata: We presented ourselves along with Ibn 'Abbas at the funeral procession of Maimuna at a place called Sarif. Ibn 'Abbas said, "This is the wife of the Prophet so when you lift her bier, do not Jerk it or shake it much, but walk smoothly because the Prophet had nine wives and he used to observe the night turns with eight of them, and for one of them there was no night turn."

This is a mystery too.

Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 6: Narrated Anas: The Prophet used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night, and he had nine wives.

(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:52). The (Exalted) Messenger used to visit all nine of his wives every night. The Holy Messenger used to have intercourse with all of his wives in one hour of the day and night (without taking a bath) and these (wives) were eleven.

(Bukhari, Book of Bath 1:189) The Holy Prophet had the (sexual) power of 30 men

(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:52) The Prophet said that the best man amongst his followers is the onewho has the greatest number of wives.

Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 7: Narrated Said bin Jubair: Ibn 'Abbas asked me, "Are you married?" I replied, "No." He said, "Marry, for the best person of this (Muslim) nation (i.e., Muhammad) of all other Muslims, had the largest number of wives."

All these hadith above about having the largest number of wives and multiple sexual relations are solid proof of the ulema’s latent sexual promiscuity. They misuse the Prophet’s name to justify their own sexual fantasies. We will see more examples of this in this book.

(Bukhari, Kitabul Ikrah p.669) The Holy Prophet asked, “Who will buy this slave from me?” HazratNaeem bought him for 800 Darham

Bukhari has made the Prophet a slave trader ! On the contrary the Prophet taught us in the Quran to free the slaves. Here is the evidence : Surah 90:11-13 “He should choose the difficult path. Which one is the difficult path? The freeing of slaves.”

(Bukhari 2:134) The sun rises between the two antlers of Satan.

And we thought the sun rose in the East, over Japan the Land of the Rising Sun ! Bukhari has other ideas about the East :

(Bukhari, Book of Talaq 3:132) Fitna (tribulation) rises in the East.

(Bukhari, Book of Sales and Book of Nikah 3:59) After the fall of Khyber, people described the beauty of Safia BintHui, the new bride of a slain enemy soldier. The Prophet chose her for himself. On the way to Madina he stopped and had intercourse with her. His companions did not know if she was a wife or a concubine. Later, a veil was drawn between her and the men-folk and they came to know that she was a wife.

This is cruel and inhuman treatment of a female war captive. According to Bukhari, the Prophet had sexual intercourse with this female captive of war. This obviously fake hadith is another manifestation of the ulema’s own sexual fantasies. About the prisoners of war, God told the Prophet the following :

Surah 8:70 “O you prophet, tell the prisoners of war in your hands, "If GOD knew of anything good in your hearts, He would have given you better than anything you have lost, and would have forgiven you. GOD is Forgiver, Most Merciful."

The Quran does not tell the Prophet to have sexual intercourse with the female prisoners.

(Bukhari Kitabul Qadr 3:543) A man inquired, “We earn income from these bondwomen, (other narratives mention prostitutes) so can we do coitus interruptus with them?” The Prophet said, “There is no sin in doing that”.

This hadith from Bukhari makes the Prophet a pimp who consented to some men earning an income from the prostituites as well as practicing coitus interuptus with them. From slave trading to sleeping with nine or elevenwomen in one night to sexual intercourse with the female captives to prostituting women ! Indeed Bukhari makes the Prophet of Islam to be a real demon possessed barbarian.

(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:60). The Prophet said, “Bad luck, misfortune and doom can exist in a wife, a home and a horse”

(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:61) After my time, the greatest tribulation for men will be women”

(Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:97) I saw that most of those entering the gate of hellfire were women

Again these are slanderous statements against women. Bukhari says that your mothers, daughters, sisters, cousins and aunts are like dogs and donkeys. Now they are like horses too. And of courseyour mothers, sisters and daughters will enter the hellfire in large numbers.

(Bukhari Kitabul Ta'abir) Seeing a black woman in a dream is the sign of an oncoming epidemic.

This is racist prejudice against black people.

(Bukhari, Book of Medicine, vol.3). Aisha said to the Prophet, “Ah! My head is bursting.” He said, “Iwish it did.” Aisha responded: “You want me to die so that you can spend the next night with another wife”

(Bukhari Kitabul Mahrabain and Kitabut Tib p.254) Some people got sick in Madina. The Prophet advised them to drink camel's urine and milk. After they became well, they killed a shepherd. The Prophet ordered that their hands and feet be chopped off and their eyes gouged out. They were laid on burning sand. When they asked for water it was denied them. So much so that they tasted sand until they died.

More medical prescriptions. From dipping flies in your tea to drinking camels urine to cure fevers.And also gouging out the eyes of the prisoners and cutting off their feet and hands.

(Bukhari Kitabul Fatan 3:718). The Prophet’s wives awoke late one morning. He said, “Many women who are dressed up in this world will be raised unclothed in the Hereafter”

More sexual fantasies from the ulema.

(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:213).The Prophet used to become very restless and frightened whenever he sawthe sky overcast.

This is another slander against the Prophet.

(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:231) “The hellfire complained to Allah, "One part of me is eating the other part." So, the hellfire was allowed two breaths - one in summer and one in winter. That is how you see the change of seasons.”

One wonders if Bukhari had any intelligence at all.

(Bukhari Beginning of Creation 2:237) Adhaan (the call to prayer) puts Satan to flight, expelling gas as he runs away.

The call to prayer triggers flatulence.

(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:241) Satan rests at night in your noses

Well until he hears the call to prayer.

(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:213) A rooster sees angels, and a donkey sees Satan

That’s why we need both donkeys and roosters – to get a complete viewpoint.

(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:244) .Rats are the lost tribe of Israel because they drink not the camel's milk, but drink goat’s milk.

Rats have expensive tastes. In the modern world goat’s milk is expensive.

(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:245) Five animals are sinful, so kill them even in Makkah: rat, scorpion, eagle, crow, and a biting dog.

(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:247) The Prophet ordered the killing of dogs

(Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:251). Woman was created from the rib so she will always remain crooked. Leave her crooked

More slander against your mothers, sisters, wives, daughters and aunts.

(Bukhari, The Book of Bath 1:193) Maimoona said that she gazed at the Prophet taking a bath after intercourse, until she saw him wash his private parts.

(The Book of Bath #246) Abu Salma and the brother of Aisha went to Aisha to learn about the bath after sexual intercourse. She procured a container of water and took a bath. There was a veil between them and her.

Until Maimoona made this observation and Aisha gave a practical demonstration to Abu Salma and her brother, the Arab men and women never knew how to wash after sexual intercourse.

(Bukhari The Book on Menstruation 1:98, chapter 207) If the Prophet wanted to have intercourse with a menstruating wife, he ordered her to tie a loincloth even though the menstruation would be atits peak. Then he had intercourse..

Abu Hurairah narrates that the Prophet said, "I was praying. Satan came in front of me and tried to force me to break my prayers. Allah gave me control over him and I threw him down. I thought of tying him with a pillar so that you could see him in the morning (Bukhari 1:469, chapter 766).

This hadith is obviously fake because the Prophet tells us in the Quran that we cannot even see the Satan, let alone wrestle the Satan. Here is the evidence : Surah 7:27 ‘The satan and his tribe can see you from places while you cannot see them.’

The Messenger of Allah addressed his wife Safia as “O’ you bald-headed perished one!” (Bukhari, Kitab Talaq p.143).

(Bukhari 2:261) Umro bin Maimoon reported, “I saw a monkey surrounded by a swarm of other monkeys. He had committed adultery with a female monkey. So, all monkeys stoned him to death. I cast stones, too.”

A variation of this hadith reports, “The female monkey had been lying down with a middle-aged male when a young male came and gestured with his eye. The female slowly pulled her hand away from under the head of the middle-aged monkey and tiptoed away from him. Then she committed adultery with the young monkey. The older monkey got wind of what had happened so he yelled and gathered around him all monkeys in the vicinity. They stoned both (the adulterers) to death!”.

Monkeys stoning other monkeys to death? So Sunni jurisprudence is derived from monkeys too.

(Bukhari, Book of Nikah p.96).When a woman refuses to come to her husband’s bed, angels curse her until shereturns

(Hadith #185) Once the Holy Prophet asked for a bowl of water. He washed his hands and face in it. Then he rinsed his mouth in it and after that ordered Abu Musa and Bilal to drink the used water !

The Holy Prophet passed a group of women. He said to them, “Ladies, give alms, because I have seen you burning in hell in great numbers.” When the women asked the reason for it, he said:

“You women curse too much!”

“You are ungrateful to your husbands.”

“In spite of being deficient in intellect as well as in religion, you are capable of prevailing over a man of wisdom; you are a creation the like of which has never been seen.”

“Is not the testimony of a woman one half that of a man? This is

the measure of deficiency of your intellect!”

“And mind you, when a woman has her periods she is not allowed to pray or to fast. This is the measure of your deficiency in religion.”

Saim Bakar the Ultra Fundamentalist And Ultra Conservative Muslim

IKHWAN SERIES 2 : SAHIH BUKHARI IS NOT EVEN WRITTEN BY BUKHARI.

2010-11-28T19:34:00.000-08:00

IKHWAN SERIES 2 : SAHIH BUKHARI IS NOT EVEN WRITTEN BY BUKHARI.

The Ahlul Sunnah have been misled into becoming kuffar or disbelievers because they have abandoned the Quran. Today ask any ulema of Ahlul Sunnah simple basic questions about the Quran and they will stare at you blankly. They do not know the

Quran. For example in this book so far I have quoted dozens of verses from the Quran. To the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah these verses will appear like Greek because they have never seen these verses or paid any real attention to the meanings of these verses from their own Quran.

Is it a wonder then that the Prophet will one day complain :

Surah 25.30 “And the Apostle will say: O my Lord! surely my people have taken flight away from the Quran”

Arabic : “Wa qaala rasuulu Ya Rabbi Inna kaumi ittakhazu hadha al Quraana

mahjuura !! “

This is what the ulema have done. They have totally abandoned the Quran. So what do the ulema know? They will only know some information from their fake hadith literature. But that too only in sketchy bits and pieces. They do not even know their hadith properly.

The Ahlul Sunnah says that in their pantheon of fake hadith, the writings of a fellow by the name of Imam Bukhari ‘is second only to the Quran’. They say that without this fake hadith they cannot understand the Quran -a Book which was revealed by God and which God says is ‘made easy to remember’.

The Quran repeats this particular verse four times :

[Surah 54.17] And certainly We have made the Quran easy for remembrance, but is there anyone who will TAKE HEED ?

This exact same verse is repeated in 54:22, 54:32 and 54:40. To enable mankind to take heed of the Quran, God has made the Quran easy to remember. This is actually simple logic. If the Quran is the Book of Guidance for mankind then it must be user friendly. It is really easy to remember the Quranic teachings. The reader will see how easily the writer can regurgitate appropriate verses throughout this book. Yet the writer has read the Quran from cover to cover only once in his lifetime – and that too in translation only. It just sticks to your head. But once again the ulema also reject this verse from the Quran. They do not believe that the Quran can be understood easily without their ‘second only to the Quran’ collection of fake Bukhari hadith.

But the ulema themselves have not read the Bukhari collection of fake hadith from cover to cover. If they had done so they would have discovered that while the Quran has 6,348 verses, the collection of fake Bukhari hadith tries to explain only one third or less of the 6,348 verses of the Quran. There are not enough fake Bukhari hadith to explain the whole Quran.

And the ulema do not realise that in the fake hadith of Bukhari they will come across the following words “No hadith were recorded here” as Bukhari’s ‘explanation’ for 28 surahs or chapters of the Quran. (See Sahih Bukhari, Volume 6 -Tafsir of the Quran, translation by Dr Muhammad Muhsin Khan, University Medina Al Munawwara).

In other words Bukhari himself admits that he was not able to record any hadith to explain 28 complete surahs or chapters of the Quran. That is 25 percent of the 114 surahs in the Quran. And the remaining hadith are sketchy, ridiculous and do not explain any of the verses of the Quran at all.

And yet the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah say the collection of fake Bukhari hadith is ‘second only to the Quran’. Here is a really sick description of Bukhari by an Ahlul Sunnah admirer:

“If the rich literature of Hadith is assumed a splendid collection of pearls, Al-Jami'us Sahih of Imam al-Bukhari is rightfully privileged to be called a gigantic ocean serenely flowing for the providence and safeguard of those precious pieces of magnificence. A vast, yet shore less ocean having lavishly quenched the thirst of many, it is unanimously held in the high esteem of being 'the most authentic book after the book of Allah' by advocates and adversaries alike’.

They speak with pride about “the dazzling level of measures adopted by Imam Bukahri in preserving the credibility of his 'Sanad' ”. But despite all these ridiculous comments there is no evidence that Imam Bukhari even wrote the so called hadeeth collection known as 'Sahih Bukhari'.

The ulema themselves say that "Bukhari’s text has not come down to us in a single uniform version, but exists in several ‘narrations’ (riwayat), of which the version handed down by al-Kushaymani (d.389) on the authority of Bukhari’s pupil al-Firabri is the one most frequently accepted by the ulema".

This is called the “Ulema Shuffle” otherwise known as double talk. They do not have a single, written collection of hadith which they can say with certainty was written by Imam Bukhari. There is no such thing. What they have are bits and pieces that have been sorted and put together over a period of almost 600 years.

The ulema realize that they stand on empty lies. To cover one lie they create a thousand more lies. To divert attention from the fact that Bukhari is not the author of a complete collection of the fake hadith that is attributed to him, the Ahlul Sunnah ulema say that at least seventy full commentaries have been written on Imam al Bukhari’s ‘great Sahih’. How this helps prove their case is best left to the ulema to shuffle.

According to the ulema, the most celebrated of these commentaries is “without question the Fath al-Bari (‘Victory of the Creator’) by Imam Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, a work which was the crown both of its genre and of the Imam’s academic career. It is appreciated by the ulema for the doctrinal soundness of its author, for its complete coverage of Bukhari’s material, its mastery of the relevant Arabic sciences, the wisdom it shows in drawing lessons (fawa’id) from the hadiths it expounds, and its skill in resolving complex disputes over variant readings. For Bukhari’s text has not come down to us in a single uniform version, but exists in several ‘narrations’ (riwayat), of which the version handed down by al-Kushmayhani (d.389) on the authority of Bukhari’s pupil al- Firabri is the one most frequently accepted by the ulema”. ( see “Ibn Hajar Asqalani and his Commentary Fath al-Bari” at http://www.centralmosque. com/biographies/asqalani2.htm and www.thesaurus-islamicus.li).

By the ulema’s own admission their collection of fake Bukhari hadith is compiled from a ‘commentary’ on Bukhari by another fellow by the name of Ibnu Hajar Al Askalani. But this fellow Ibnu Hajar never met Bukhari because according to the ulema Ibnu Hajar Askalani lived and died in 852 AH which is 596 years after Bukhari who is supposed to have lived and died in 256 AH. The ulema say Bukhari never wrote down a completed book. There were no printing presses or photocopy machines or computers available at that time. And 596 years separated Ibnu Hajar from Bukhari.

So how did Ibnu Hajar write a commentary about a book that never existed ? To overcome gaps like these the ulema say that Ibnu Hajar based his writing on the commentary of another fellow called al-Khushaymani who lived and died in 389 AH.

Thus they narrow the yawning gap to 463 years. 463 years separated Ibnu Hajar al Askalani and the commentary of al Khushaymani. But even the commentary of al Khushaymani did not exist in one volume or in one collection.

But Khushaymani in turn is still separated from Bukhari by 133 years. Another gap here. To fill this gap the ulema call upon another fellow by the name of al Firabri (Muhammad ibn Yusuf ibn Matar al Firabri 231 – 320 AH) who they say was the missing link and source of the collection of fake hadith from Bukhari (died 256 AH) to Khushaymani (died 389 AH) to Ibnu Hajar (died 852 AH). The reader must carefully bear in mind that despite all these names and throughout this passage of 596 years between Bukhari and Ibnu Hajar, the ulema’s own evidence admits that there never was any complete collection of Bukhari hadith. There was and there is no such thing. The whole thing has been faked by the ulema.

Obviously the claim that Al Askalani wrote his commentary based on Kushaymani is a lie. Askalani never met Kushyamani. 463 years separated them. The same argument goes for the seventy other commentators ? In fact the number 70 is itself mind boggling. Each of the seventy claims to have his own source. But they are all different (the so called variant readings). The seventy versions (or so they claim) have their own Kushaymanis, Fiabris and Askalanis. They have their own gaps of 400 years, 500 years, 300 years and so on. This guesswork is the basis of the religion of Ahlul Sunnah. With the Shiah it is even worse.

And this is what the ulema say about Ibn Hajar’s commentary on Bukhari hadith: “Ibn Hajar frequently uses the Kushmayhani variant as his standard text, but gives his reasons, often in complex detail, for preferring other readings where these seem to have particular merit. In doing this he makes it clear that he is authorised, through the ijaza-system, for all the riwayat he cites”.

In other words Ibnu Hajar Askalani merely patched together HIS idea of what he thought the Sahih Bukhari should be. This is because there were variances in the available Bukhari hadeeth. It is just guesswork. This is what they have today which they call the Sahih Bukhari.

And again despite talking so much about the fake Bukhari hadith the ulema still say that " there are few hadith which can be understood adequately without reference to the often complex debates which have taken place concerning them between the scholars. "

According to the ulema few hadith can be understood without referring to the complex debates among the ulema. This is a lark. The ulema say that the hadith explains the Quran. Now they say without their complex debates you cannot even understand the hadith.

We are expected to believe that the Almighty God who created the universe, the sky, the animals and the humans will now have to depend on the complex debates between the ulema before the human being can understand the Quran -God’s guidance for mankind. Such arrogant boasts by the ulema can only arise from extreme kuffar. And despite talking so much, the collection of fake Bukhari hadith still says ‘No hadith were recorded here’ as the explanation for 28 surahs of the Quran. Bukhari does not have enough fake hadith to explain the Quran !

The reader is also requested to see the chapter which lists totally stupid and ridiculous hadith from Bukhari. To conclude this chapter, here is just one example :

Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 188:

Narrated 'Amr bin Maimun:

During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.

Lets just call this the Monkey hadith !

There is no “heaven” and “hell” in the Quran.

2009-11-16T01:29:00.000-08:00

This will definitely come as an even greater shock but this is also true. There is no “heaven” and “hell” in the Quran. The idea of a “heaven” and a “hell” have been prevalent but only among some groups like the judeo-christians. Large swathes of humanity do not have this idea in their belief systems. The Buddhist based civilizations (China, Korea, Japan) and the Hindus do not have any idea of heaven and hell. That is almost half the human race. We cannot simply dismiss the intellect of half the human race.

The idea of a heaven and hell is obviously a control mechanism which comes in handy to keep believers in line. Smart beggars disguising themselves as ‘religious people’ found it useful to frighten the masses with burning hellfire if they did not listen to them. Those who listened to them, accompanied by donations in the box, would be promised the delights and promises of heaven. The 72 virgins promised to the Muslim suicide bombers all over the world are just evolutions of the same idea. The underlying falsehood remains the same.

The Quran does not support the idea of a “heaven” or “hell”. When we study the Quran, it is important to pay attention to how particular words are used throughout the text. This is a book which claims to provide guidance for all of humanity, hence by necessity it must be very carefully written. Indeed it is an extremely well written book and God the Author has chosen His words carefully.

Here is a verse from Surah Al Baqarah:

2:26 Inna Allaha laa yas tahyee an yadriba mathalan maa baoodatan famaa fawqa-haa fa amma-llatheena aamanoo faya’lamoona annahu al haqqu min rabbihim wa amma-al latheena kafaroo faya’ qooloona matha araada-Allaahu bi hatha mathalan yu’dillu bihi katheeran wa yahdee bihi katheeran wamaa yu’dillu bihi illa al fasiqeena.

2:26 GOD does not shy away from citing any kind of allegory, from the tiny mosquito and greater. As for those who believe, they know that it is the truth from their Lord. As for those who disbelieve, they say, "What did GOD mean by such an allegory?" He misleads many thereby, and guides many thereby. But He never misleads thereby except the wicked.

This is a very important verse because other verses in the Quran are directly related to this verse. This verse 2:26 lays the ground rule that in the Quran, God also teaches by using examples or allegories. The keyword here is mathalan which means example or allegory.

Lets look at a few verses from the Quran which have this word mathalan or allegory.

[24:35] GOD is the light of the skies and the earth. The allegory (mathalu) of His light is that of a concave mirror behind a lamp that is placed inside a glass container. The glass container is like a bright, pearl-like star. The fuel thereof is supplied from a blessed oil-producing tree, that is neither eastern, nor western. Its oil is almost self-radiating; needs no fire to ignite it. Light upon light. GOD guides to His light whoever wills (to be guided). GOD thus cites the parables for the people. GOD is fully aware of all things.

It does not mean here that God is the actual light (like a torchlight or street lamp) of the skies and the earth. The Sufis and other deviants confuse this particular verse and make much about the ‘spiritual light of God’. God is not a spirit and there is no such thing as spirituality either.

This verse is a clear example of an allegory. It is not real. We have to use our imagination. We have to imagine a bright lamp, solidly built in clear glass which is dependable that throws useful illumination so that we can see in the dark. That gives us an idea of what is God’s guidance. It does not mean that God actually shines a torchlight at anyone or that His “light” actually comes from a lamp behind a glass set in a niche in a wall somewhere in the “heavens”.

Here is another example:

[29:41] The allegory (mathalu) of those who accept other masters beside GOD is that of the spider and her home; the flimsiest of all homes is the home of the spider, if they only knew.

This is an allegory or example. Again here we must use our imagination. The scientists say that pound for pound the silk in the spider’s web is stronger than steel. This means that if we can make a spider’s web from equally thin and silky strands of steel, the ‘steel’ web will just disintegrate in the wind. But despite being so strong, the actual fact is that when there are strong winds the spider webs do get damaged. The web is made of really thin strands of silk. So indeed the spider lives in a very flimsy home.

Extending the allegory, it means that those who take for masters other than God are putting themselves at great risk too. Their safety and their existence become very precarious – just like living in a spider web. A flimsy and unpredictable fate. These are allegorical descriptions only but we get the idea.

The idea of a “heaven” and “hell” is also taken from the Bible. These are Biblical ideas. The Quran does not mention a heaven or hell. The Quran mentions ‘jannah’ which literally means a garden. The ‘naar’ mentioned in the Quran means fire and it implies torment, hardship and difficulty. We will see this shortly.

Here is another verse that also talks about an allegory or mathalu. This verse also requires us to use our imagination.

[47:15] The allegory (mathalu) of jannah (the garden) that is promised for the righteous is this: it has rivers of unpolluted water, and rivers of fresh milk, and rivers of wine - delicious for the drinkers - and rivers of strained honey. They have all kinds of fruits therein, and forgiveness from their Lord. (Are they better) or those who abide forever in the hellfire, and drink hellish water that tears up their intestines?

Note carefully that this veres uses the word mathalu or allegory. It is illogical and impossible to have actual “rivers” of fresh milk. Or rivers of honey or wine. Even in the Biblical “heaven” one cannot possibly have an actual river flowing with milk, honey or wine. Where would one stop to drink it – from a heavenly ferry boat? We can only imagine rivers of wine, honey and milk. It simply means a state of plenty, ease and comfort. It can never be real.

People who are righteous, who work hard and are productive will get to enjoy a comfortable life. Their life becomes like an allegorical garden (jannah) with rivers of goodness and plenty. This is therefore descriptive of a life here on earth. There is no “heaven” beyond the skies somewhere in Outer Space.

The final part of 47:15 says ‘they have all kinds of fruits therein, and forgiveness from their Lord’. Again fruits grow on earth. There are no “heavenly” fruits.

Lets look at 2:25 in the Quran which again describes fruits in the garden.

2:25 Give good news to those who believe and lead a righteous life that they will have gardens (jannatin) with flowing streams. When provided with a provision of fruits therein, they will say, "This is what was provided for us previously." Indeed they are given the same. They will have pure spouses therein, and they abide therein forever.

2:25 does not refer to a “heaven” beyond the skies in Outer Space. It refers to people who believe and lead a righteous life who will be given gardens with flowing streams. They will harvest fruits which they have seen before – meaning these are earthly fruits and not “heavenly” fruits. Again this is an allegorical description only. It means plenty, ease and comfort. Here on earth. There is no such thing as a “heaven” in Outer Space.

Please note that the following verse is 2:26 which I have already quoted above, where God speaks about using allegories (mathalan) to teach us something. The context of 2:25 continues into 2:26 meaning the description of a Garden (Jannah) with flowing streams, fruits, rivers of honey, wine and milk are all allegorical descriptions of plenty and ease.

There is no real “heaven” in Outer Space with an actual river of honey or actual river of wine.

Here is one more verse which uses the word allegory or mathalu:

13:35 The allegory (mathalu) of the Garden (Jannah), which is promised for the righteous, is flowing streams, inexhaustible provisions, and cool shade. Such is the destiny for those who observe righteousness, while the destiny for the disbelievers is Hell.

Again streams, provisions and cool shade are all allegorical. A life of plenty. There is no actual “heaven” somewhere in Outer Space with provisions and cool shade. That is more akin to the imaginary animation in Hollywood cartoons and movies meant to excite children.

People who observe righteousness will enjoy a comfortable life. Around the world today we see that people who use common sense, technology, logic and are productive are the ones who enjoy comfortable lives.

The advanced countries of the world (both in the East and the West) are already enjoying their Garden or Jannah. Their supermarkets have rivers of milk, wine and honey on sale. Their people live in comfortable homes and enjoy shade and warmth. This is the Jannah or Garden that is promised to those who work righteousness. These are also the believers. These are the real Muslims. I will explain this in more detail later.

We will also need to look at the word Naar (Fire) which is traditionally taken as “hell”. Hell is a Biblical term. The Naar of the Quran simply refers to tribulation, hardship and calamity in this world that we live in. It is not a real “hell” somewhere beyond the skies in Outer Space.

Here is an interesting verse which proves again that the jannah (garden) and the naar (tribulation, hardship) are indeed here on earth.

7:50 The dwellers of the naar (fire) will call on the dwellers of the garden (jannah): "Let some of your water, or some of GOD's provisions to you flow towards us." They will say, "GOD has forbidden them for the disbelievers."

The people who are in incessant hardship (the dwellers of the naar) will ask the people who are in plenty (the dwellers of the jannah) to give them some water and some provisions.

Obviously then the naar (fire) and the jannah (garden) are next door neighbours close enough for the dwellers of “hell” to ask their neighbours to actually pass cups of water over the neighborhood fence. How can this be? Wont the “fires of hell” singe the people of “heaven” if they are so close to the “hell fire”? And what sort of pleasurable “heaven” would it be to see your neighbors burning in “hell” all the time right next door?

This verse only makes sense if the jannah (garden) and the naar (fire) are here on earth. The jannah and the naar represent the condition of our being.

Some people live in ease and plenty (jannah) while others live in misery (naar). Indeed since ages, access to clean drinking water has been an issue and a matter of survival – but usually in those countries which suffer huge overdoses of religion and acute shortages of common sense. The so called Islamic countries fall in this category quite eminently. Hence even the simple routines of daily life often become a struggle for existence.

To conclude, the descriptions of jannah and naar in the Quran are all allegories only or mathalu. They are not real. Jannah and naar refer to a condition of our being. Jannah and naar are not the heaven and hell respectively of the Bible. There is no such thing. It is no point telling someone ‘Go to hell’. There is no such thing.

THE FALSEHOOD ABOUT ABRAHAM AND THE FALSE SACRIFICE OF HIS SON.

2009-11-14T23:18:00.000-08:00

THE FALSEHOOD ABOUT ABRAHAM AND THE FALSE SACRIFICE OF HIS SON.

The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have invented many falsehoods about Abraham – whom God appointed the imam or leader for all mankind (imamu lin nass). The evil falsehoods which the Ahlus Sunnah and Shiah have fabricated about this important Rasul or Messenger of God seek to corrupt the image of Abraham, his wife, his son and family.

Again these falsehoods are all plagiarized from the Christian Bible. These falsehoods also completely contradict the Quran. We will show proofs from the Quran and expose these lies against the good Prophet and Messenger Abraham and his family.

Firstly here is one concocted story from the Christian Bible. This Biblical slander against the Prophet Abraham forms the basis for the false hadith that has been written down by the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah. This is taken from the Book of Genesis :

Genesis 16 : 1 - 16

Hagar and Ishmael

¹ Now Sarai, Abram's wife, had borne him no children. But she had an Egyptian maidservant named Hagar; ² so she said to Abram, "The LORD has kept me from having children. Go, sleep with my maidservant; perhaps I can build a family through her."

Abram agreed to what Sarai said. ³ So after Abram had been living in Canaan ten years, Sarai his wife took her Egyptian maidservant Hagar and gave her to her husband to be his wife. ⁴ He slept with Hagar, and she conceived.

When she knew she was pregnant, she began to despise her mistress. ⁵ Then Sarai said to Abram, "You are responsible for the wrong I am suffering. I put my servant in your arms, and now that she knows she is pregnant, she despises me. May the LORD judge between you and me."

⁶ "Your servant is in your hands," Abram said. "Do with her whatever you think best." Then Sarai mistreated Hagar; so she fled from her.

⁷ The angel of the LORD found Hagar near a spring in the desert; it was the spring that is beside the road to Shur. ⁸ And he said, "Hagar, servant of Sarai, where have you come from, and where are you going?"

"I'm running away from my mistress Sarai," she answered.

⁹ Then the angel of the LORD told her, "Go back to your mistress and submit to her." ¹⁰ The angel added, "I will so increase your descendants that they will be too numerous to count."

¹¹ The angel of the LORD also said to her:

"You are now with child

and you will have a son.

You shall name him Ishmael, ^[a]

for the LORD has heard of your misery.

¹² He will be a wild donkey of a man;

his hand will be against everyone

and everyone's hand against him,

and he will live in hostility

toward ^[b] all his brothers."

¹³ She gave this name to the LORD who spoke to her: "You are the God who sees me," for she said, "I have now seen ^[c] the One who sees me." ¹⁴ That is why the well was called Beer Lahai Roi ^[d] ; it is still there, between Kadesh and Bered.

¹⁵ So Hagar bore Abram a son, and Abram gave the name Ishmael to the son she had borne. ¹⁶ Abram was eighty-six years old when Hagar bore him Ishmael.

Now here is the fake hadith from the Bukhari collection which forms the basis of the Ahlul Sunnah’s lies about Abraham. Note the extreme similarity between the Christian Bible and the fake Bukhari hadith.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Number 584:

Narrated Ibn Abbas:

When Abraham had differences with his wife), (because of her jealousy of Hajar, Ishmael's mother), he took Ishmael and his mother and went away. They had a water-skin with them containing some water, Ishmael's mother used to drink water from the water-skin so that her milk would increase for her child. When Abraham reached Mecca, he made her sit under a tree and afterwards returned home. Ishmael's mother followed him, and when they reached Kada', she called him from behind, 'O Abraham! To whom are you leaving us?' He replied, '(I am leaving you) to Allah's (Care).' She said, 'I am satisfied to be with Allah.' She returned to her place and started drinking water from the water-skin, and her milk increased for her child. When the water had all been used up, she said to herself, 'I'd better go and look so that I may see somebody.' She ascended the Safa mountain and looked, hoping to see somebody, but in vain. When she came down to the valley, she ran till she reached the Marwa mountain. She ran to and fro (between the two mountains) many times. They she said to herself, 'i'd better go and see the state of the child,' she went and found it in a state of one on the point of dying. She could not endure to watch it dying and said (to herself), 'If I go and look, I may find somebody.' She went and ascended the Safa mountain and looked for a long while but could not find anybody. Thus she completed seven rounds (of running) between Safa and Marwa. Again she said (to herself), 'I'd better go back and see the state of the child.' But suddenly she heard a voice, and she said to that strange voice, 'Help us if you can offer any help.' Lo! It was Gabriel (who had made the voice). Gabriel hit the earth with his heel like this (Ibn 'Abbas hit the earth with his heel to Illustrate it), and so the water gushed out. Ishmael's mother was astonished and started digging.

This is the false Biblical story that has been reproduced in the hadith of Bukhari about the jealousy of Abraham’s wife Sarah towards a supposed bondwoman by the name of Hagar whom she ‘gave’ to her husband Abraham to bed. According to this false hadith, at that time Sarah herself could not bear children and decided to give her bondwoman as a mistress to her husband.

Firstly the names Sarah and Hajar are not mentioned anywhere in the Quran therefore the Quran cannot confirm these names that are mentioned in the Bible as well as in the false hadith books.

The idea that a Prophet and Rasul of God would even have a slavegirl in his household is repulsive of all the teachings of the Quran and what God taught to Abraham and Moses. The Prophets of God came to free slaves - NOT to have slave girls in their household. This is what the Prophet taught us :

Surah [90 : 4 - 16]

[90.4] Certainly We have created man in distress.
[90.5] Does he think that no one has power over him?
[90.6] He shall say: I have wasted much wealth.
[90.7] Does he think that no one sees him?
[90.8] Have We not given him two eyes,
[90.9] And a tongue and two lips,
[90.10] And pointed out to him the two conspicuous ways?
[90.11] But he would not attempt the uphill road,
[90.12] And what will make you comprehend what the uphill road is?
[90.13] (It is) the setting free of a slave,
[90.14] Or the giving of food in a day of hunger
[90.15] To an orphan, having relationship,
[90.16] Or to the poor man lying in the dust.

God will show man two paths (two conspicuous ways ?). He must choose the path that requires greater commitment and effort. That is the path of freeing the slaves, feeding the hungry, feeding the orphans and the poor man. Never will God ask anyone, especially His chosen Prophets and Rasuls to keep slave girls in their homes and then take their slave girls as mistresses.

Also God’s teaching for mankind is that men should always marry the women before bedding them but here the false hadith says the Prophet Abraham slept with a slave girl.

But the falsehood against Abraham and his family continues. Long before the Quran, the Christians had already fabricated another slander against the Almighty God that He had commanded the Prophet Abraham to sacrifice his son. The evil slander by the Christians makes both God and Abraham parties to a barbaric ritual sacrifice of a human life. Even the very thought of this evil slander is preposterous. Here is the Biblical slander against God and Abraham :

Genesis 22

Abraham Tested

¹ Some time later God tested Abraham. He said to him, "Abraham!"

"Here I am," he replied.

² Then God said, "Take your son, your only son, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains I will tell you about."

³ Early the next morning Abraham got up and saddled his donkey. He took with him two of his servants and his son Isaac. When he had cut enough wood for the burnt offering, he set out for the place God had told him about. ⁴ On the third day Abraham looked up and saw the place in the distance. ⁵ He said to his servants, "Stay here with the donkey while I and the boy go over there. We will worship and then we will come back to you."

⁶ Abraham took the wood for the burnt offering and placed it on his son Isaac, and he himself carried the fire and the knife. As the two of them went on together, ⁷ Isaac spoke up and said to his father Abraham, "Father?"

"Yes, my son?" Abraham replied.

"The fire and wood are here," Isaac said, "but where is the lamb for the burnt offering?"

⁸ Abraham answered, "God himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering, my son." And the two of them went on together.

⁹ When they reached the place God had told him about, Abraham built an altar there and arranged the wood on it. He bound his son Isaac and laid him on the altar, on top of the wood. ¹⁰ Then he reached out his hand and took the knife to slay his son. ¹¹But the angel of the LORD called out to him from heaven, "Abraham! Abraham!"

"Here I am," he replied.

¹² "Do not lay a hand on the boy," he said. "Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son."

¹³ Abraham looked up and there in a thicket he saw a ram ^[a] caught by its horns. He went over and took the ram and sacrificed it as a burnt offering instead of his son. ¹⁴ So Abraham called that place The LORD Will Provide. And to this day it is said, "On the mountain of the LORD it will be provided."

¹⁵ The angel of the LORD called to Abraham from heaven a second time ¹⁶ and said, "I swear by myself, declares the LORD , that because you have done this and have not withheld your son, your only son, ¹⁷ I will surely bless you and make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as the sand on the seashore. Your descendants will take possession of the cities of their enemies, ¹⁸ and through your offspring ^[b] all nations on earth will be blessed, because you have obeyed me."

This is the Biblical story of Abraham wanting to sacrifice his son because allegedly Abraham thought it was God’s command. The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have swallowed this false Biblical story hook, line and sinker. Until today, to commemorate this slander against God and the Prophet Abraham the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah sacrifice goats, camels and cows on the Feast of Sacrifice or Eid Al Adha which also forms one of the cornerstones of their pilgrimage ritual in Mecca.

The story of Abraham trying to sacrifice his son is recorded in the Quran but in completely different detail. The Quran cannot confirm the Biblical story at all. Here is the beautiful Quranic version :

Sura 37

37: 102. When he (Ismail) grew enough to work with him, he (Abraham) said, "My son, I see in my sleep (araa’ fil manami) that I am sacrificing you. What do you think?" He said, "O my father, do what you are commanded to do. You will find me, God willing, patient."

37: 103. They both submitted, and he put his forehead down.

37: 104. We called him: "O Abraham.

37: 105. "surely you have confirmed the dream (qad saddakta al ru’ya) ?" We thus reward the righteous.

[The word ‘saddaqta’ means ‘to confirm’. For example refer Surah 66:12 where Mary confirms (saddaqa) the words of her Lord as true].

37: 106. That was an exacting test indeed.

37: 107. We redeemed him with a great sacrifice.

37: 108. And we preserved his history for subsequent generations.

37: 109. Peace be upon Abraham.

37: 110. We thus reward the righteous.

37: 111. He is one of our believing servants.

This is the accurate record in the Quran of Abraham trying to fulfil what he saw in his sleep. But this was definitely NOT a commandment from God. It was just what Abraham saw in his sleep. Let us analyse what the Quran says.

Firstly in the narrative above we see the following:

Surah 37: 102. When he (Ismail) grew enough to work with him, he (Abraham) said, "My son, I see in my sleep (araa’ fil manaami) that I am sacrificing you. What do you think?" He said, "O my father, do what you are commanded to do. You will find me, God willing, patient."

When God commands his Messengers to do something He gives them clear commandments which leave no room for misunderstanding by the Messengers. See the following verses :

Surah 10:15 “when our signs are recited to them, clear signs”

Surah 7:101 “their messengers came to them with clear signs”

Surah 2:87 “We gave Jesus son of Mary clear signs”

Surah 2:92 “Moses came to you with clear signs”

Hence it is not likely that God would give Abraham unclear commands such that after seeing something in his sleep (manami), we find Abraham asking his son ‘What do you think?’ This cannot be the behaviour of a Messenger of God when carrying out God’s commands.

Then we see that a command to kill one’s own child totally contradicts God’s teachings as follows :

[Surah 6.151] “Say: Come I will recite what your Lord has forbidden to you -- that you do not associate anything with Him and show kindness to your parents, and do not slay your children for (fear of) poverty-- We provide for you and for them -- and do not draw nigh to indecencies, those of them which are apparent and those which are concealed, and do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden except for the requirements of justice; this He has enjoined you with, that you may understand.”

The Prophet taught us God’s command that we cannot kill our children even for fear of poverty. So how can God command another Prophet to kill his own son as a ‘sacrifice’ ? And the verse further says that we cannot kill any soul except in justice. Where was the justice in Abraham killing his son ? What crime or sin had Abraham’s son committed ?

In the following verse God tells us that the killing of children (human sacrifice) is indeed a pagan practice.

[Surah 6.137] “And thus their pagan idols have made fair to the pagan polytheists the killing of their children, that they may cause them to perish and obscure for them their religion; and if Allah had pleased, they would not have done it, therefore leave them and that which they forge.”

God’s command to mankind is that the killing of children (human sacrifice) is a pagan practice. Therefore it is impossible for God to command Abraham to carry out the pagan practice of killing his own son. Here is another verse from the Quran that forbids the killing of children:

The ulema of course reject all the above verses of the Quran. They would rather believe the Biblical slander that God commanded the Prophet Abraham to sacrifice his son. The ulema prefer the barbaric act of killing your own son.

They say that God never intended that Abraham’s son would be killed. It was merely a test. Here is another verse that exposes the ulema’s slander against God and the Prophet Abraham :

[Surah 60.12] O Prophet! when believing women come to you giving you a pledge that they will not associate aught with Allah, and will not steal, and will not commit fornication, and will not kill their children, and will not bring a calumny which they have forged of themselves, and will not disobey you in what is good, accept their pledge, and ask forgiveness for them from Allah; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

In this verse God commands the Prophet to test the believing women by accepting their pledge that they will not kill their children. This is because it is a great sin to kill one’s own child. Therefore it is impossible that God would test another Prophet Abraham in the exact opposite manner ie by telling Abraham to kill his own child.

Would Abraham have known about these commandments by God that we should not kill our children ? He certainly would have known because God tells us that whatever He revealed in the Quran has been revealed before to Abraham and Moses :

Surah 87 : 18 – 19

“Most surely this is in the earlier scriptures, the scriptures of Ibrahim and Musa.”

Most certainly then God had also taught Abraham previously that human sacrifice was a sinful thing to do. But not the Christian Bible. The Christian Bible teaches the falsehood that God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son. Christians also believe that they must perform a cannibalistic type ritual of drinking the blood of Christ who they again believe was ‘sacrificed’ by God to atone for human sins. This belief in human sacrifice alone exposes the pagan origins of Christianity. Unfortunately the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have plagiarized this false Christian belief.

And we are told clearly in the Quran that killing an innocent believing soul is a great sin:

"Anyone who kills a believer on purpose, his retribution is Hell, wherein he abides forever, God is angry with him, and condemns him, and has prepared for him a terrible retribution." 4:93

The retribution for killing another believer is hellfire. Here is another verse:

"No believer shall kill another believer, unless by mistake.... " 4:92

Again a believer cannot kill another believer. That would be against God’s teachings.

We are then told in the Quran that God NEVER advocates sin:

" ... Say, "God never advocates sin. Are you saying about God what you do not know?" Surah 7:28.

After teaching mankind that killing their own children is a pagan act and a great sin and that the retribution for the sin of killing a believer is the Hellfire – God cannot contradict Himself by giving Abraham a test which requires Abraham to kill his own son.

If we put these facts side by side, we know that Abraham’s son was a good believer, thus killing him would be a sin, and we know that God NEVER advocates sin. The truth becomes clear; Abraham had a dream but it was not from God.

But because Abraham was a righteous believer "We thus reward the righteous" God intervened and saved Abraham’s son. God intervened and saved Abraham from commiting a great sin (37:107).

The ulema of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah will however reject all these verses from the Quran. That is because they are disbelievers or kuffar. They will prefer to uphold the Biblical story that God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son.

Perhaps without realising by now (after 1000 years of blind stupidity) the ulema have actually been upholding the Bible for so long. The Shiahs and the Sunnis are actually the best Biblical christians in the world today.